- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT01701284
Repetitiv transkraniell magnetisk stimulering hos cancerpatienter med depression och ångest (rTMSinCP)
En randomiserad öppen pilotstudie för att utvärdera säkerheten och effektiviteten av repetitiv transkraniell magnetisk stimulering hos cancerpatienter med depression och ångest
Studieöversikt
Status
Intervention / Behandling
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Förenta staterna, 60611
- Northwestern University
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Beskrivning
Inklusionskriterier:
- Kvinna
- Ålder 22-80
- Hade en tidigare diagnos av cancer (vilken typ eller stadie som helst) bekräftad av officiella journaler
- Har en DSM IV-diagnos av egentlig depression
- Har en HAM-D 24-objekt poäng på mer än 20
- Misslyckades med att få tillfredsställande förbättring från en tidigare antidepressiv medicin vid eller över den minimala effektiva dosen och varaktigheten i den aktuella depressiva episoden
- Alla deltagare måste ha gett undertecknat, informerat samtycke innan registreringen i studien
Exklusions kriterier:
- Deltagaren hade bröstcancer med hjärnmetastaser
- Det finns bevis för sjukdomen vid tidpunkten för inträde i rättegången
Närvaro eller ny historia av andra samtidiga cancerformer, med följande undantag:
- Deltagare med fullständigt behandlad basal eller skivepitelcancer kan inkluderas i studien om deras läkare anser att de är medicinskt stabila
- Deltagare med fullständigt behandlat in situ-karcinom i bröstet eller livmoderhalsen kan inkluderas i studien om de inte har fått kemoterapi under den senaste månaden och deras läkare bedömer att de är medicinskt stabila
- Deltagare med pre-cancerösa lesioner i tjocktarmen kan inkluderas i studien om de inte har fått kemoterapi under den senaste månaden och deras läkare bedömer att de är medicinskt stabila
- Deltagaren har nyligen opererats (inom två veckor)
- Deltagaren genomgår kemoterapi
- Deltagaren är gravid eller ammar
- Deltagaren har något metallföremål i eller runt huvudet
- Deltagaren har en pacemaker
- Har instabila självmordstankar som fastställts av patientens behandlande psykiater
- Missbruksstörning inom de senaste sex månaderna
- Signifikant historia av huvudskada/trauma definierat som medvetslöshet i mer än 1 timme
- Återkommande anfall till följd av huvudskadan
- Tydliga kognitiva följdsjukdomar från huvudskadan och kognitiv rehabilitering efter skadan
- Varje störning som skulle predisponera deltagaren för anfall
- Användning av samtidig medicinering som avsevärt ökar risken för anfall. Sådana läkemedel kan innefatta neuroleptika (ex. haloperidol, droperidol), klozapin, tricykliska antidepressiva medel (ex. amoxapin, klomipramin), bupropion (särskilt den omedelbara frisättningen - IR - formuleringen) donepezil, psykostimulerande medel (ex. metylfenidat), teofyllin och/eller andra läkemedel som minskar kramptröskeln. För individer som använder något av dessa läkemedel kommer en studieläkare att utvärdera läkemedlen och doserna för att fastställa riskerna och fördelarna. Dessa kommer sedan att diskuteras med individens primärvårdsläkare för att avgöra om individen ska uteslutas från studien.
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Högersidig lågfrekvent rTMS
Deltagarna kommer att få rTMS administrerat vid 1 Hz till den högra dorsolaterala prefrontala cortex (dlPFC) en gång om dagen i 40 minuter, 5 dagar i veckan, under totalt sex veckor.
|
Andra namn:
|
|
Experimentell: Vänstersidig högfrekvent rTMS
Deltagarna kommer att få rTMS administrerat vid 10 Hz till vänster dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (dlPFC) en gång om dagen i 40 minuter, 5 dagar i veckan, under totalt sex veckor.
|
Andra namn:
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Change in Depression Severity (HDRS-17) at Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Tidsram: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6.
|
This measure reports the overall change in depression severity(HDRS-17) from baseline (Week 0) at each follow-up assessment. Overall Change is defined as the score at each subsequent time point minus the score at Baseline. Scale Information: Name: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Construct: The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered assessment of depressive symptom severity. Total Score Calculation: The total score is calculated by summing the individual scores of all 17 items. Range: Total scores range from 0 to 52. Directionality: Higher values represent a worse outcome (more severe depression), while lower values represent a better outcome. Calculation Logic: The values reported are the absolute difference of outcomes for each treatment arm. For each participant, the relative change is calculated as: Score at Visit - Baseline Score. Negative numbers indicates a reduction in symptom severity (improvement) and a positive number indicates worsening in symptom severity |
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6.
|
|
Relative Change in Depression Severity (HDRS-17) at Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Tidsram: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6
|
Measure Description: This measure reports the relative (percentage) change in depression severity from baseline (Week 0) at each follow-up assessment. Scale Information: Name: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Construct: The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered assessment of depressive symptom severity. Total Score Calculation: The total score is calculated by summing the individual scores of all 17 items. Range: Total scores range from 0 to 52. Directionality: Higher values represent a worse outcome (more severe depression), while lower values represent a better outcome. Calculation Logic: The values reported are the mean percentage changes for each treatment arm. For each participant, the relative change is calculated as: ((Score at Visit - Baseline Score) / Baseline Score) * 100. A negative percentage indicates a reduction in symptom severity (improvement). |
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Side Effects (UKU)
Tidsram: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6
|
Side effects assessed at Weeks 2, 4, 6 via Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) scale (48 items, 0=none to 3=severe; higher=worse). 'Treatment-emergent' worsening is a score increase ≥1 from baseline (Tx #1) on any item with possible/probable relation to intervention. Data reported is the count of participants meeting criteria for any of the clusters. Psychic Cluster: concentration, asthenia, sedation, memory, depression, unrest, sleep/dream changes, emotional indifference. Neurological Cluster: dystonia, rigidity, hypokinesia, hyperkinesia, tremor, akathisia, seizures, paresthesia, headache. Autonomic Cluster: accommodation, salivation, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, micturition, polyuria, dizziness, tachycardia, sweating. Other Cluster: rash, pruritus, photosensitivity, weight change, menses changes, galactorrhea, gynecomastia, libido changes, erectile dysfunction. |
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Change in Anxiety Severity (HAM-A) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Tidsram: Baseline (Week 0), Week 1- Week 6 (Weekly assessments)
|
Measure Description: The overall change in anxiety severity is assessed using the total score of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) at each protocol-specified follow-up visit compared to the baseline score at baseline(Week 0) Scale Information: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Construct: A clinician-rated scale used to measure the severity of a patient's anxiety symptoms, including both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints). Total Score Calculation: The total score is calculated by summing the individual scores of all 14 items. Range: Total scores range from 0 to 56. Directionality: Higher values represent a worse outcome (greater anxiety severity), while lower values represent a better outcome. Calculation Logic: The values reported represent the absolute difference in scores for each treatment arm at every assessment interval minus the score at baseline. |
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1- Week 6 (Weekly assessments)
|
|
Relative Change in Anxiety Severity (HAM-A) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Tidsram: Baseline(Week 0), Week 1- Week 6 (Weekly assessments)
|
This measure reports the relative (percentage) change in anxiety severity from baseline (Week 0) at each follow-up assessment. Scale name: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). It is a clinician-rated scale used to measure the severity of a patient's anxiety symptoms. The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, measuring both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Total score is calculated by summing all 14 items. The total Score ranges from 0 to 56. Higher values represent a worse outcome (greater severity of anxiety), while lower values represent a better outcome. For each protocol-specified time point (Weeks 1-6), the relative change is calculated for as: ((Score at Visit - Baseline Score(Week 0) /Baseline Score)*100. A negative percentage indicates a reduction in symptoms (better outcome). |
Baseline(Week 0), Week 1- Week 6 (Weekly assessments)
|
|
Correlation Between Baseline Anxiety (HAM-A) and Change in Depression Severity (HDRS-17, HAM-D)
Tidsram: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 6
|
This measure assesses the relationship between the severity of anxiety symptoms at the start of treatment and the magnitude of depression improvement at Week 6. Scale 1: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Measures anxiety severity. Total range: 0 to 56. Higher values = worse outcome. Scale 2: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17, HAM-D). Measures depression severity. Total range: 0 to 50. Higher values = worse outcome. Statistical Analysis & Interpretation: Change Calculation: Depression change is calculated as (Week 6 Score - Baseline Score). A more negative value represents greater improvement. Coefficient: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) is used. Interpretation: A positive correlation indicates that higher baseline anxiety is associated with higher (less negative) change scores, meaning less improvement. A negative correlation indicates that higher baseline anxiety is associated with lower (more negative) change scores, meaning greater improvement. |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 6
|
|
Correlation Between Baseline Anxiety (HAM-A) and Harm Avoidance (TCI-R)
Tidsram: Baseline
|
This measure assesses the relationship between clinical anxiety symptoms and the personality trait of Harm Avoidance at baseline. Scale Information: Scale 1: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Measures anxiety severity. Total range: 0 to 56. Higher values = worse outcome. Scale 2: Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R) - Harm Avoidance Subscale. Measures the personality trait of Harm Avoidance. Results are reported as standardized T-scores (mean of 50, standard deviation of 10). The typical range for T-scores is 20 to 80. Outcome Direction: For both scales, higher values represent higher levels of the construct (more anxiety and higher harm avoidance). Statistical Analysis & Interpretation: Coefficient: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho). Interpretation: A positive correlation indicates that individuals with higher clinical anxiety symptoms also tend to score higher on the personality trait of Harm Avoidance. |
Baseline
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Mehmet Dokucu, MD, PhD, Northwestern University
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Allmänna publikationer
- George MS, Lisanby SH, Avery D, McDonald WM, Durkalski V, Pavlicova M, Anderson B, Nahas Z, Bulow P, Zarkowski P, Holtzheimer PE 3rd, Schwartz T, Sackeim HA. Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 May;67(5):507-16. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46.
- Burgess C, Cornelius V, Love S, Graham J, Richards M, Ramirez A. Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005 Mar 26;330(7493):702. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.D3. Epub 2005 Feb 4.
- Janicak PG, O'Reardon JP, Sampson SM, Husain MM, Lisanby SH, Rado JT, Heart KL, Demitrack MA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a comprehensive summary of safety experience from acute exposure, extended exposure, and during reintroduction treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;69(2):222-32. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0208.
- O'Reardon JP, Solvason HB, Janicak PG, Sampson S, Isenberg KE, Nahas Z, McDonald WM, Avery D, Fitzgerald PB, Loo C, Demitrack MA, George MS, Sackeim HA. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 1;62(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
- Machado S, Paes F, Velasques B, Teixeira S, Piedade R, Ribeiro P, Nardi AE, Arias-Carrion O. Is rTMS an effective therapeutic strategy that can be used to treat anxiety disorders? Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.024. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
- Paes F, Machado S, Arias-Carrion O, Velasques B, Teixeira S, Budde H, Cagy M, Piedade R, Ribeiro P, Huston JP, Sack AT, Nardi AE. The value of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of anxiety disorders: an integrative review. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2011 Aug;10(5):610-20. doi: 10.2174/187152711796234943.
- Schutter DJ. Antidepressant efficacy of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in double-blind sham-controlled designs: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2009 Jan;39(1):65-75. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003462. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
- Slotema CW, Blom JD, Hoek HW, Sommer IE. Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;71(7):873-84. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04872gre. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Beräknad)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- NU 12CC12
- NCI-2012-01691 (Registeridentifierare: NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP))
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .