Justering af antibiotikadosis hos pædiatriske onkologiske patienter med febril neutropeni og øget renal clearance (DAR-ARC)

Background and Rationale In pediatric cancer patients, Augmented Renal Clearance (ARC) is a common factor that affects outcomes. Febrile neutropenia, a frequent occurrence during cancer treatment, requires anti-infective drugs for treatment. However, ARC increases the elimination of these drugs through glomerular filtration, posing a risk of antibiotics insufficient blood levels. This may lead to difficulties in managing infections and the risk of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains emerging. Febrile neutropenia is often associated with ARC, and in these patients standard antibiotic dosages frequently miss target concentrations. We propose defining categories of renal hyperfiltration to adjust antibiotic dosages upward in pediatric patients with ARC.

To estimate renal function, molecules such as creatinine or cystatin C are routinely measured in the blood. Clinicians commonly rely on the Schwartz formula for determining the patients glomerular filtration rate (GFR) when adjusting antibiotic treatment. Although other formulas based on creatinine and/or cystatin C have been developed, their effectiveness in oncological patients with ARC remains unexplored. If these alternative formulas prove more effective in ARC situations, it may prompt a reconsideration of how we determine GFR in hyperfiltrating children.

Measurement and procedures Clinicians will decide if prescribe piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem, according to the clinical situation. The trial will have 3 arms, the two control arms will receive standard dosages of antibiotics (non-hyperfiltrating patients, control group 2, and hyperfiltrating patients randomized to control group 1c). The third group, hyperfiltrating patients randomized to intervention group 1i, will receive experimental doses. The randomization will be made using REDCap®.

A TDM at trough level (Ctrough) of meropenem (MER) or piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP) will be systematically performed just before the fourth dose, and again before the fourth dose after each further dosage adaptation. The dosage will be adjusted if blood levels are outside the target therapeutic ranges. TDM will be monitored at least twice a week and more frequently in case of unfavorable clinical outcome or significant change in serum creatinine.

Objectives

Primary objective:

To compare the proportion of early achievement of antibiotic concentration targets in hyperfiltrating patients, using either standard dosage recommendations (control group, 1C) or a new set of Dosage Adjustment Rules for Augmented Renal Clearance (DAR-ARC) (intervention group, 1i).

Secondary objectives:

1. To compare the proportion of early achievement of antibiotic concentration targets (for MER or PIP) between non hyperfiltrating patients (control group 2) and the intervention group (1i).
2. To compare the mean/median duration of fever episodes between control groups and intervention group (1i)
3. To compare the incidence of intervention-drug adverse effects (CTCAE v5, grade 3 or higher, grade 2 judged to be probably/definitely related to study intervention and SAE) between the control groups (group 1c and 2) and the intervention group (1i)
4. To compare the proportion of patients requiring TDM-based readjustment of antibiotic dosages due to blood level below or above the target ranges between the control group 1c and the intervention group 1i, at any time during the antibiotic treatment.
5. To compare the eGFR estimated by creatinine-based Schwartz formula in comparison to creatinine and cystatin C based Schwartz formula, creatinine-based quadratic formula, combined creatinine and cystatin C Quadratic formulas, Zappitelli formula, and Schwartz-Lyon formula.

Statistical Considerations The proportion of achievement of the target ranges before the fourth antibiotic dose will be compared between the two randomized groups with a mixed effects logistic regression.

Duration of fever will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis will be used to evaluate if the intervention decreases duration of fever.

The occurrence of adverse events and the outcome of the febrile neutropenia episode will be compared between groups using a Chi-square test.

The use of TDM for further adjustment of MER and PIP dosage will be explored with descriptive statistics. A population pharmacokinetic description of MER and PIP concentration will be attempted.

To evaluate different eGFR formulas, we will calculate the mean difference in eGFR estimation for each formula compared to the creatinine-based Schwartz formula and determine a 95% confidence interval for each formula. Comparison between hyperfiltrating non hyperfiltrating will be made using student T-test or Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Unless otherwise stated, the α risk p -values reported will be two-sided and the nominal limit will be set to 0.05.

Risk / Benefit Assessment The risk of this study is over exposure to wide-spectrum antibiotics. This implies drugs dose-dependent adverse events.

High blood trough concentrations (Ctrough) of broad-spectrum antibiotics have been associated with reversible neurological and nephrological side effects in adults. The threshold level chosen in this protocol is well below the values for which there is a risk of a 50% increase in side effects for both antibiotics. Doses of MER and PIP excess of authorized doses, guided by therapeutic drug monitoring, have not been associated with additional toxicities in adults. The evaluation of renal clearance before the choice of dosage, daily clinical and biological monitoring and regular monitoring of Ctrough will limit risks.

The expected benefit will be improved circulating exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. This could allow better control of the infection with a more rapid and favorable clinical course.